USCIS does not schedule an applicant for the Oath of Allegiance in cases where USCIS receives or identifies potentially disqualifying information about the applicant after approval of his or her application. While the officer conducting the re-verification process does not adjudicate the application once again, the officer may raise any substantive eligibility issues. The officer who conducts the re-verification is not the same officer who conducts the interview. The internal procedures include a “re-verification” procedure where all approved applications are reviewed for quality. If an officer approves a naturalization application, the application goes through the appropriate internal procedures before the USCIS office schedules the applicant to appear at a ceremony for the administration of the Oath of Allegiance. The notice should address the outcome of the interview and the next steps involved for continued cases. The officer must provide the applicant with a notice of results at the end of the interview regardless of the outcome. The officer must base his or her decision on the laws, regulations, precedent decisions, and governing policies.Ĭontinue the examination without making a decision (if more information is needed), if the applicant needs to be rescheduled, or for other relevant reasons or If the decision is not issued within 120 days of the interview, an applicant may request judicial review of his or her application in district court. We'll start phase one as soon as possible, and in the background we'll continue planning the later phases and adapt them as we go along.USCIS has 120 days from the date of the initial naturalization interview to issue a decision. We should add some space into the schedule later for additional work this 'flexibility' will need. Start quickly and keep planning the later stages of the project.ĭavid: I still don't think this is the right decision, but I'm happy to go with the majority. Let's go with your decision.Ĭarolina: Yes, I'll follow your lead, Jani.ĭavid: Well, I guess that's decided then. We need to be flexible, and we also need to move quickly.Įmiko: Well, you're the project leader. But plans can change, even the good ones – and business changes often. I'm listening … and thinking.ĭavid: Do you agree we should get the plan right first, and then start with phase one?Ĭarolina: I'm sorry, David. Jani: Well, it means that we start quickly and then adapt as we go along.Ĭarolina: Um … I'm sorry. I think we should take an agile approach. However, we'll waste too much time if we wait until everything is planned before we actually start working on the project. Jani: I agree with you on that point, David. How can we start phase one if we're not fully clear on where the rest of the project will take us? We might make a wrong decision and waste time. We can work out the rest later, as we go along.ĭavid: I'm sorry, I don't think so. I know we're still planning the structure of the later phases of the project, but I think we should begin phase one as soon as possible. Well, I think the best way is for each of you to give your opinion and then we can discuss and make a decision.Įmiko: Yes, that works for me too. Let's first think about the scheduling of each project phase. What do you think, Emiko?ĭavid: Can I interrupt? I think we should first be clear about the process we'll use to make the decision. We're going to discuss this and make a decision together. I think we need to decide between us what to do, to make sure it works for all departments. So, we're here today to define the timeline for our new project.Įmiko: Hold on a moment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |